
Most managers think Organizational Design is a synonym for an Org Chart. They spend weeks moving boxes, changing titles, and redrawing reporting lines, only to find that six months later, the same old problems—slow decisions, siloed information, and cultural friction—remain.
Why? Because an Org Chart is just a map of power. Organizational Design is the mechanics of execution.
The Framework: The Star Model™
To design a high-performing organization, Jay Galbraith argued you must align five specific levers. If one point of the star is out of alignment, the whole system wobbles.
- Strategy: Your formula for winning. (The “Where are we going?”)
- Structure: The roles and power hierarchy. (The “Who decides what?”)
- Processes: The flow of information and collaboration. (The “How does work get done?”)
- Rewards: The symbols and compensation that drive behavior. (The “What is celebrated?”)
- People: The mindsets and skills required. (The “Who do we need?”)
The Actionable Insight: The “Misalignment Test”
Leaders often try to fix a Strategy problem by changing the Structure (the “re-org”). It almost never works.
This week’s diagnostic: Look at your biggest current frustration.
- Is it a lack of speed? (Likely a Process or Structure issue).
- Is it a lack of innovation? (Likely a Rewards or People issue).
- Is it confusion over priorities? (That’s Strategy).
The Lesson: You cannot “re-org” your way out of a “reward” problem.
Tomorrow’s Preview
In Episode 2, we dive into the first point of the star: Strategy. We’ll discuss why “Form follows Function” and how to tell if your current design is actually sabotaging your 2026 goals.
Leave a comment