Dr-David-C.Com

Welcome to Future-Proofing Strategy: Technology and Exponential Change, Season 11, Episode 41!

We launch our final season by confronting the core challenge of modern strategy: exponential change. Technology doesn’t advance linearly; it follows an S-Curve, characterized by slow beginnings, explosive growth, and eventual maturity. A firm’s demise often occurs not because it failed to improve its current technology, but because it failed to jump to the next S-Curve—the discontinuous innovation that replaces the old one.

This episode focuses on The Exponential Challenge: understanding the nature of technological advancement and using the Technology S-Curve to determine when a core technology is reaching the point of diminishing returns and requires a massive, strategic jump into an H3 (venture) replacement.

1. The Technology S-Curve and Discontinuity

The Technology S-Curve models the relationship between the cumulative effort (R&D investment, time) put into a technology and the performance improvement realized from that effort.

Theoretical Framework: Technology S-Curves and Discontinuous Innovation

1. Emergence (Lower Arc): Initial R&D investment yields slow, incremental performance gains. The technology is often clumsy, expensive, and niche (e.g., early electric vehicles). H3 investment (E22) is required here.
2. Rapid Improvement (Steep Curve): Investment yields exponential performance gains. Market adoption accelerates, and the technology becomes mainstream (e.g., modern smartphone processing power). The technology is now funding its own H2 growth.
3. Maturity/Diminishing Returns (Upper Arc): Further investment yields minimal performance improvement. The technology is hitting its physical or theoretical limits. The strategic risk is highest here.

Discontinuous Innovation: This is the point where a new technology (a new S-Curve) emerges, offering a different, often superior, trajectory that eventually replaces the mature technology. The firm must identify the moment its current S-Curve is flattening and allocate capital to the emerging S-Curve before the disruption hits.

2. Actionable Insight: Identifying the Plateau

The strategic challenge for senior management is to prevent the organization from becoming trapped by the success of its existing technology (the “Success Trap”).

Actionable Tool: S-Curve Performance Audit

For the firm’s most critical VRIO technology asset (E5)—the core technology underpinning the Product Innovation Pillar—leaders must track specific performance metrics:

Audit Metric	Strategic Question	S-Curve Signal	Strategic Mandate Triggered
Rate of Improvement	Is the cost-per-unit-of-performance (e.g., cost per megabyte of storage) slowing down despite increasing R&D?	Flattening Curve.	Reduce H1 (core) R&D and Reallocate capital to H3 (replacement) R&D.
Market Saturation	Is market adoption for this technology nearing 80%-90% of potential customers?	Maturity.	Prepare H2 (growth) units for consolidation/efficiency focus.
Customer Solution Gap	Are customer pain points (E2) still high, even with the technology at peak performance?	Vulnerability.	Seek adjacent technologies that solve the customer’s entire problem, not just the current technical one.

The Strategic Pivot: The moment the Rate of Improvement metric triggers a “Flattening Curve” signal, the organization must initiate a major Resource Recalibration (E15), moving talent and funding out of the mature R&D effort and into the high-risk, emergent technology portfolio.

3. Strategy for the Jump: Dual Execution

It is strategically lethal to stop funding the successful, cash-generating H1 core business to jump immediately to the risky H3 future. The firm must master dual execution.

• Exploitation (Current S-Curve): Focus on Operational Excellence (S1) and cost leadership to maximize NOPAT (E37) from the mature technology. This cash flow funds the jump. The management style must be hierarchical and efficient (E10).
• Exploration (New S-Curve): Establish separate, autonomous H3 teams (E22) to research and validate the replacement technology. This team must be protected from the H1 bureaucracy and given a high Risk Appetite (E25) for failure. The management style must be agile and entrepreneurial (E10).

The Governance Filter: Senior leadership’s primary role becomes managing the cannibalization risk. They must actively support the H3 team, even when its initial (and often inferior) performance threatens the revenues of the H1 core business.

4. Governance: H3 Technology Funding

The capital allocation process (E38) must be structurally adjusted to handle the volatility of H3 technology funding.

• Real Options Valuation (ROV): Use ROV instead of standard DCF (E39) to justify H3 investment. Since the ROIC is unknown, ROV values the initial small investment as a strategic option—buying the right to make a larger investment later, once the initial technical uncertainty is resolved. This helps justify the high-risk investment to the Board.
• Talent Scarcity: Treat the specialized talent for the new S-Curve (e.g., AI engineers, quantum physicists) as the most critical resource. The H3 team’s budget must be primarily directed toward securing this Rare and Inimitable talent (E23).

What’s Next in Future-Proofing Strategy?

We have the framework for analyzing technological cycles. Now, we must build a system to constantly scan the horizon for the next big S-Curve.

In Season 11, Episode 42: Foresight and Scanning: Building the Technology Radar, we will institutionalize Technological Foresight by building an internal Technology Radar and prioritizing emerging technologies based on their potential impact on VRIO assets.